There are a lot of complexities in the world of law, and one such complexity is CPLR 5015(a)(1) and its implications on timing for vacatur applications. Today, we’re going to take a deep dive into the understanding of this rule and how it applies.
This particular rule is part of the Civil Practice Law and Rules in New York, specifically addressing the vacating or setting aside of a judgment or order. When it comes to vacatur applications, there's a 'hard-and-fast' one-year time limit under CPLR 5015(a)(1), but this only applies when the vacating ground is potentially excusable. The time frame begins, not from the 'entry' of the order or judgment, but from the 'service' of the order or judgment with notice of entry.
In simple terms, the clock starts ticking when you're informed about the order or judgment. This seems like common sense. After all, how can you be expected to comply with or appeal something you aren't aware of? The dates of service are always documented, which makes the computation of the one-year deadline easy and objective.
The courts maintain an inherent authority to vacate their orders when justice demands it, despite the time-limiting language of the statute. So, even if the one-year statutory deadline has passed, courts might consider the vacatur motion on the merits, if the circumstances are compelling enough. But be prepared to provide a reasonable excuse for the delay.
While courts may sometimes show flexibility, it's always best to play it safe. Whenever possible, file the order to show cause to vacate a judgment or order rendered on default within the time prescribed by the statute. If you're late, you’ll have to deal with the complications of explaining the delay.
Another key point to note is that parties moving to vacate defaults under CPLR 5015(a)(1) must demonstrate a potentially meritorious claim or defense. In other words, you must show that you have a valid reason for why the initial order or judgment should be vacated.
While there's a time limit for vacating excusable defaults under CPLR 5015(a)(1), there are circumstances that could legally supersede the statutory deadline. An example of such a situation is the COVID-19 shutdowns in 2020 and 2021, during which a series of Executive Orders were issued that tolled time limits in the courts.
In conclusion, while CPLR 5015(a)(1) and the time limit for vacatur applications might seem like a rigid rule, there are layers of interpretation and considerations involved. As always, every case is unique, and you should consult with an experienced attorney to understand your specific situation.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Arnold A. Arpino & Associates, P.C., is a debt collector as defined under Federal Law. In certain situations relating to our debt collection practice, we are trying to collect a debt from you. We will use any information you give us to help collect the debt.
Arnold A. Arpino & Associates, P.C., is a full service law firm that represents individuals and businesses in a variety of different practice areas. Our firm regularly appears in the Courts throughout Long Island, New York City, and the Hudson Valley.
Arnold A. Arpino & Associates, PC